aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/README.mdown
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'README.mdown')
-rw-r--r--README.mdown30
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/README.mdown b/README.mdown
index f5d961a..4b12335 100644
--- a/README.mdown
+++ b/README.mdown
@@ -1,16 +1,20 @@
These files are my solutions to Kernighan and Ritchie's *The C Programming
-Language, 2nd Edition*. My aim is to deepen my understanding of C, using only
-the concepts covered in content that comes before each exercise. That means no
-"cheating" by using standard library features that aren't covered in the book
-yet. As a result, many of my solutions will probably not be "the best", but
-suitable for the goal at hand: *learning*.
+Language, 2nd Edition*. The aim is to deepen my understanding of C, using only
+the concepts covered in content that comes before each exercise. That means
+no "cheating" by using standard library features that aren't covered in the
+book yet. According to [`comp.lang.c`][clc], this is known as *Category-0
+compliant*. As a result, many of my solutions will probably not be "the best",
+but suitable for the goal at hand: *learning*.
-I chose this route because as I was reading the K&R, I didn't feel like I was
-learning anything new, but I knew C was known for its simplicity and efficiency.
-If I wasn't learning anything about efficiency and simplifying my programs, then
-why was I learning C? I tackled a few exercises and found that I was beginning
-to learn a few things I hadn't ran into before.
+I chose this route because as I read through the K&R, I didn't feel like I
+was learning anything new. C is known for its simplicity and efficiency, so
+I thought, "If I'm not learning anything about efficiency and simplifying
+my programs, then why am I learning C?" I tackled a few exercises and found
+that I was beginning to learn a few things I hadn't ran into before, and this
+repository was born.
-Critique is welcome, but please keep in mind the limitations I've outlined in
-the first paragraph. Also note that some incomplete implementations are noted,
-which I intend on revisiting. Any suggestions and advice are welcome.
+Critique is welcome, but please keep in mind the limitations I've outlined in
+the first paragraph. Some incomplete implementations are noted, which I intend
+on revisiting or annotating. Any questions, suggestions, and advice are welcome.
+
+[clc]: http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/K%26R2_solutions:Ancillary:Category_numbers