diff options
author | zlg <zlg@zlg.space> | 2013-04-16 00:53:42 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | zlg <zlg@zlg.space> | 2013-04-16 00:53:42 -0500 |
commit | 736bbc64f2b0af4faead40be3dc98ebe7f9fcbff (patch) | |
tree | ffa0b5ea527389766cd5a647053295884c6c6c03 | |
parent | Solve Exercise 2-10: lower() (diff) | |
download | knr-736bbc64f2b0af4faead40be3dc98ebe7f9fcbff.tar.gz knr-736bbc64f2b0af4faead40be3dc98ebe7f9fcbff.tar.bz2 knr-736bbc64f2b0af4faead40be3dc98ebe7f9fcbff.tar.xz knr-736bbc64f2b0af4faead40be3dc98ebe7f9fcbff.zip |
Solve Exercise 3-1: binsearch2
-rw-r--r-- | ch2/2-10_lower.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | ch3/3-01_binsearch2.c | 71 |
2 files changed, 72 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/ch2/2-10_lower.c b/ch2/2-10_lower.c index fe0288b..44cdde7 100644 --- a/ch2/2-10_lower.c +++ b/ch2/2-10_lower.c @@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ int lower(int c) { int main() { char foo = 'F'; - printf("The follow letter should be lowercase: %c\n", lower(foo)); + printf("The following letter should be lowercase: %c\n", lower(foo)); return 0; } diff --git a/ch3/3-01_binsearch2.c b/ch3/3-01_binsearch2.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bcd66c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/ch3/3-01_binsearch2.c @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +#include <stdio.h> + +/* The C Programming Language: 2nd Edition + * + * Exercise 3-1: Our binary search makes two tests inside the loop, when + * one would suffice (at the price of more tests outside). Write a version + * with only one test inside the loop and measure the difference in run- + * time. + * + * Answer: I don't know how to measure the performance of the original + * function. `time` reports 0.001 sec, so it's not precise enough. + * + * Anyway, the trick is to create a loop that will exit on two conditions: + * either the last-inspected integer in the array matches the one we're + * looking for, or it doesn't. The only issue with this is it won't exit + * the loop as soon as it's found; it may take a few more iterations for it + * to fully exit, where it will determine which condition made it exit. + * + * I don't have a good tool to measure execution time with (that I know of), so + * my best guess is binsearch2 is faster because it uses only one test in the + * while loop. However, it won't exit the loop as soon as the match is found; it + * needs another few iterations for 'low' to equal or surpass 'high'. + */ + +int binsearch(int x, int v[], int n) { + int low, mid, high; + + low = 0; + high = n - 1; + while (low <= high) { + mid = (low + high) / 2; + if (x < v[mid]) { + high = mid - 1; + } else if (x > v[mid]) { + low = mid + 1; + } else { + return mid; + } + } + return -1; +} + +int binsearch2(int x, int v[], int n) { + int low, mid, high; + + low = 0; + high = n - 1; + + while (low < high) { + mid = (low + high) / 2; + if (x <= v[mid]) { + high = mid; + } else { + low = mid + 1; + } + } + + if (x == v[low]) { + return low; + } else { + return -1; + } +} + +int main() { + int foo[5] = {1, 2, 3, 5, 6}; + int i; + for (i = 1; i < 7; i++) { + printf("binsearch2 for %d is %d\n", i, binsearch2(i, foo, 5)); + } +} |